Skip Navigation
Welcome to the website for the Town of Southwick, Massachusetts
Image of Southwick, Massachusetts
This table is used for column layout.



E-Gov Information
Spacer
E-Gov Information
Spacer
E-Government Award Recepient

Spacer
Connect-CTY


 
Official Results of the Federal Election 2008
TOWN OF SOUTHWICK
OFFICIAL RESULTS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
TUESDAY NOVEMBER 4, 2008

OFFICIAL RESULTS

                                                                                                           


Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT
BLANKS
10
2
15
27
BALDWIN & CASTLE
K
5
4
6
15
BARR & ROOT
L
10
6
8
24
MCCAIN & PALIN
R
X
970
588
909
2467
MCKINNEY & CLEMENTE
J
3
3
2
8
NADER & GONZALEZ
I
24
25
19
68
OBAMA & BIDEN
D
806
637
824
2267
WRITE IN
6
7
5
18
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894


                                                                                                           

Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
SENATOR IN CONGRESS
BLANKS
47
22
59
128
JOHN F KERRY
D
X
837
691
905
2433
JEFFREY K BEATTY
R
864
473
749
2086
ROBERT J UNDERWOOD
L
84
82
74
240
WRITE IN
2
4
1
7
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

                                                                                               


Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
REP IN CONGRESS
BLANKS
63
34
66
163
JOHN W OLVER
D
X
980
785
992
2757
NATHAN BECH
R
 
791
450
728
1969
WRITE IN
0
3
2
5
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

                                                                                                           


Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
COUNCILLOR
BLANKS
224
126
211
561
THOMAS T MERRIGAN
D
729
623
719
2071
MICHAEL FRANCO
R
X
879
522
855
2256
WRITE IN
2
1
3
6
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

                                                                                                       


Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT
BLANKS
321
228
310
859
MICHAEL R KNAPIK
R
X
1503
1034
1467
4004
WRITE IN
10
10
11
31
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

                                                                                                           


Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
REP IN GENERAL COURT
BLANKS
133
83
127
343
ROSEMARY SANDLIN
D
 
658
501
687
1846
NICHOLAS A BOLDYGA
I
X
1040
686
971
2697
WRITE IN
3
2
3
8
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

                                                                                                           


Party
Inc.
PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
REGISTER OF PROBATE
BLANKS
301
171
267
739
THOMAS P MORIARTY JR
D
X
989
766
1013
2768
JOHN T CESAN
U
 
539
334
501
1374
WRITE IN
5
1
7
13
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

                                                                                                           

QUESTION #1                                                                                                  

Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 6, 2008. 

This proposed law would reduce the state personal income tax rate to 2.65% for all categories of taxable income for the tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2009, and would eliminate the tax for all tax years beginning on or after January, 2010.  The personal income tax applies to income received or gain realized by individuals and married couples, by estates of deceased persons, by certain trustees and other fiduciaries, by persons who are partners in and receive income from partnerships, by corporate trusts, and by persons who receive income as shareholders of "S corporations" as defined under federal tax law. The proposed law would not affect the tax due on income or gain realized in a tax year beginning before   January 1, 2009.                                                                                                           

The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.                                                                                                           


PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
BLANKS
36
28
47
111
YES
647
447
497
1591
NO
X
1151
797
1244
3192
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

 

QUESTION #2                                                                                                  
                                                                                                   
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 6, 2008. This proposed law would replace the criminal penalties for possession of one ounce or less of marijuana with a new system of civil penalties, to be enforced by issuing citations, and would exclude information regarding this civil offense from the state's criminal record information system. Offenders age 18 or older would be subject to forfeiture of the marijuana plus a civil penalty of $100. Offenders under the age of 18 would be subject to the same forfeiture and, if they complete a drug awareness program within one year of the offense, the same $100 penalty.                                                                                                    
Offenders under 18 and their parents or legal guardian would be notified of the offense and the option for the offender to complete a drug awareness program developed by the state Department of Youth Services. Such programs would include ten hours of community service and at least four hours of instruction or group discussion concerning the use and abuse of marijuana and other drugs and emphasizing early detection and prevention of substance abuse.                                                                                                 

The penalty for offenders under 18 who fail to complete such a program within one year could be increased to as much as $1000, unless the offender showed an inability to pay, an inability to participate in such a program, or the unavailability of such a program. Such an offender's parents could also be held liable for the increased penalty. Failure by an offender under 17 to complete such a program could also be a basis for a delinquency proceeding.      

The proposed law would define possession of one ounce or less marijuana as including possession of one ounce or less tetrahydrocannibinol (THC"), or having metabolized products of marijuana or THC in one's body.                                                                                                 

Under the proposed law, possessing an ounce or less of marijuana could not be grounds for state or local government entitles imposing any other penalty, sanction, or disqualification, such as denying student financial aid, public housing, public financial assistance including unemployment benefits, the right to operate a motor vehicle, or the opportunity to serve as a foster or adoptive parent. The proposed law        would allow local ordinances or bylaws that prohibit the public use of marijuana, and would not affect existing laws, practices, or policies concerning operating a motor vehicle or taking other actions while under the influence of marijuana, unlawful possession of prescription forms of marijuana, or selling, manufacturing, or trafficking in marijuana.                                                                                                          

The money received from the new civil penalties would go to the city or town where the offense occurred.                                                                                                           


PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
BLANKS
26
24
40
90
YES
X
1147
862
1029
3038
NO
661
386
719
1766
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894

 

QUESTION #3                                                                                                  

Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 6, 2008.                                                                                                     
This proposed law would prohibit any dog racing or racing meeting in Massachusetts where any form of betting or waging on the speed or ability of dogs occurs. The State Racing Commission would be prohibited from accepting or approving any application or request for racing dates for dog racing.                                                                                                   

Any person violating the proposed law could be required to pay a civil penalty of not less than $20,000 to the Commission. The penalty would be used for the Commission's administrative purposes, subject to appropriation by the state Legislature. All existing parts of the chapter of the state's General Laws concerning dog and horse racing meetings would be interpreted as if they did not refer to dogs.

These changes would take effect January 1, 2010. The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.


PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
BLANKS
42
33
53
128
YES
X
1189
799
1216
3204
NO
603
440
519
1562
TOTALS
1834
1272
1788
4894


PCT 1
PCT 2
PCT 3
TOTALS
VOTER REGISTRATION 10/15/2008
2459
1932
2415
6806
TOTAL VOTED NOVEMBER 04, 2008
1834
1272
1788
4894
% VOTED NOVEMBER 04, 2008
74.58%
65.84%
74.04%
71.91%


A TRUE COPY ATTEST:                                                                                                           

Michelle L. Hill                                                                                                  



 
Town of Southwick, Massachusetts 454 College Highway, Southwick, MA 01077
Virtual Towns & Schools Website